• About
  • The Vision
  • Ordination Program
  • Bible Track
  • Theology Track
  • Recommended Reading
  • Publications
  • A Creed

Log College Ministry

Log College Ministry

Category Archives: Ministry

Choose Your Love and Love Your Choice

30 Monday May 2022

Posted by Bob Snyder in Counseling, Ministry

≈ Leave a comment

This evening is an unexpected blessing to me.  Since we talked last summer and I left the invitation with you (under no expectations) to seek me out anytime for counsel, it became my desire to have that opportunity, and then, suddenly and unexpectedly, the Lord answered this desire of mine through the invitation to give this charge to you on your night of blessing.  What a praise!  God is so good.

In order to make things memorable—especially given the euphoria of young love that renders the mind a bit numb at moments like this—I would like to hang my remarks on one peg, on a proverb.  It is not a biblical proverb, but an English proverb that has helped me many times, both personally and in counseling others, and it is a proverb that I would like to share with you tonight.

An old Puritan once said, “Choose your love and love your choice” (Henry Smith). 

Pretty simple, but pretty profound.  Let me discuss each half separately. 

First, choose your love.

When my wife and I were first dating, I took her to a pie restaurant famous for its large selection of pies.  Lemon meringue.  Pecan.  French silk.  Coconut crème.  You name it and beyond, it was there, and all displayed on a large arrangement of circles hanging above the pie cabinet.  I can still see this arrangement in my mind over thirty years later.  And the reason I can is probably due to staring at it for half an hour as my girlfriend (my future wife) could not make up her mind what to pick.  She was paralyzed! 

Can you feel it?  The pressure!  The need to make the right choice!  “I won’t get another chance, so I had better make the absolute best choice.”  Can you see the reason for her indecision?

Now, perhaps you did not agonize over the choice of your bride the way that some young men do.  However, I want you to imagine what my future wife may have felt when her chosen piece of pie finally arrived.  “Hmm,” she says, “this is not as sweet as I thought it would be.  Perhaps I should have chosen a different one.”  Now, do you get my point?

At some mile down the marriage road, reality sets in.  “Hmm, she’s not as pretty as I thought she was.  Nor as kind. Nor as thoughtful. Nor as loving.”  Instead of seeing her as “the most beautiful among women,” the phrase used of the Shulammite in Scripture (Song 1:8; 6:1), you now notice that there are, in fact, quite a number of women more beautiful.  Instead of feeling that wonderful rush of “love,” which marriage counselor Gary Chapman rightly calls euphoria, you begin to have other feelings.  Irritations.  Frustrations.  Discontentment.  Even resentment.  Words are muttered under your breath, eye contact is avoided, and you begin to think that fishing more often might be a good idea.

Now, I’m not trying to discourage you, but I am trying to prepare you to own up to this fact: You are right now choosing your love.  No one is forcing you.  This is your choice, and it is a free choice.  Consequently, you will have no right in the future to go looking around and say to yourself, as my girlfriend back in the pie restaurant may have done, “Maybe I should have chosen a different one.” 

At that point in your marriage, I want you to realize how special your wife will be to you—how uniquely special.  She will be the only one you have chosen to be your wife.  Out of all the women in the world, she alone will be “the wife of your youth,” to whom God Himself will hold you accountable as the witness of your union, according to the prophet Malachi (2:13-16).  Moreover, as we learn from the Garden of Eden, she will uniquely be the one God Himself has joined to you.  Of no other woman will you be able to say, “God has granted me this woman.”  Regardless of how much her looks or personality may change (and both will!), these two facts will remain.  You chose her and God ordained it.  Therefore, because she is your choice, you must learn to love her.

And that brings us to the second half of our proverb: “Choose your love, and love your choice.”

Now regarding love, where do we start?  So much could be said!  Perhaps the broadest thing is the unique way that we as husbands can imitate Jesus in a marriage.  Just as He did not wait for us to become lovely before He loved us and died for us (Ephesians 5:25), so also, we have the privilege to love our wives, even when they are unlovely.  That especially is Christ-like love, and Christ in us can do this.  And then, no matter what it costs us initially, we have the privilege to seek her true beauty in holiness, just as Jesus Himself sanctifies and washes His church that “He might present [her] to Himself in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing; but that she would be holy and blameless” (Ephesians 5:27).

It is in keeping with this general purpose of Christ for His own wife, that I want to stress to you one aspect about love: Love does what is right.  According to Paul, the apostle of this Christ, love “does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth” (1 Corinthians 13:6).  According to another apostle, we should “entrust [our] souls to a faithful Creator in doing what is right” (1 Peter 4:19).  “Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore, love is the fulfillment of the law” (Romans 13:10).

This truth will be extremely important for you to remember in decision-making.  When you know the right thing to do, even if it may not please your wife—and believe me, every husband has been there—please, please, please choose the right thing.  Entrust yourself to God and go for it.  If you do not, you may have her short-term happiness, but you may also have the long-term temptation to resent her, as if she made you choose the wrong option.  You are the husband.  The choice resides with you as the leader.  Therefore, own this responsibility and make the right choice.  Does that make sense?

Now, let me clarify this point, before I illustrate it.  First, I am assuming the matter at hand has some weight.  On many mundane things, such as how to stuff a card in an envelope or how to cook the turkey well, doing the “right” thing is not a moral issue, so deferring to each other’s preferences is often the truly right thing to do.  It just does not matter!  But then, with regard to weighty things, you may not always know what is right.  You will need counsel from older men, time with God in prayer and the word, and a readiness to learn from your wife, as women often notice aspects of life different than us, especially with regard to children.  As you can see, I am not saying that you should go with the first idea you think is right and then not be open to counsel from your wife.  No, seek her counsel, weigh it well, and then, after due deliberation, if you think an option is truly right, regardless of whether she will be pleased or not, pursue the right thing with all your heart.  This choice will be loving to your wife and to your family.

Now let me illustrate it for you.  Let’s imagine your post–euphoria marriage, seven years down the line, which is a typical time for couples to divorce.  Perhaps you have learned to be content with your choice of pie, but you may discover that your wife has begun to have her doubts about her choice of pie!  At first, it may be over small things.  You need a new hair style or a better stock of clothes.  Perhaps it is a new job, more money, better times, more fun.  Whatever it may be, you may find yourself trying harder and harder to please her expectations, in order to keep her satisfied with her choice.  What should you do?  What is loving?  What is right?

As a pastor, I can attest that this scenario is not uncommon.  Men and women both do it.  When the euphoria is long gone, both partners can sense that something is missing and both may look at the now-obvious deficiencies in the other and say, “There’s the problem!”  At that moment, brother, I want you to take the lead and give her Jesus.  This is not a cliché.  I’m dead serious.  At that moment, yes, confess your desire to improve, to love her truly, but then confess that the best that you can offer to her deepest needs is the Lord Jesus Himself.  Be the leader at that moment, and take your wife to Jesus.  It will be the right thing to do, because only Jesus satisfies our true and deepest needs.  And because it will be the right thing to do, it will be the loving thing to do!

Well, may God truly bless you to be the husband you need to be for your future wife and your future home!

Remember, “Choose your love, and love your choice!”

Marriage Tattoos

08 Sunday Aug 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Counseling, Ministry

≈ Leave a comment

A Marriage Blessing for a Young Man

On this night, a week before your wedding, I am encouraging you to get a tattoo.  In fact, two tattoos.

But first, let me explain.

In the middle of the Bible, we have the wisdom literature—Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Songs.  Each of these books covers a practical topic of everyday life, such as suffering, worship, family and work, the meaning of life, and marriage.  Just think.  Here, within the pages of inspired writings, are God’s very thoughts about things we experience every day.  So, what does He say about marriage?  (I imagine this topic has some interest for you at the present time!)

Admittedly, the Song of Songs is difficult to interpret.  A love song, with many flashbacks and the musical equivalence of montages, this inspired poem is mysterious.  Perhaps the form itself is teaching us about marriage.  Instead of a life lesson learned in the linear fashion of step one, step two, and so forth, marriage is messy, something we learn by experience as we go, with memories of the past and dreams of the future crowding within the turbulent present.  And yet, even with the patchwork structure of this book, there does seem to be a very, very basic timeline of married life.

The middle of the book is the wedding night, with its veiled descriptions of intimacy and its rich imagery of taste and smell.  The section closes at the moment of union with the encouraging words, “Drink and imbibe deeply, O lovers” (Song 5:1).  This line is a blessing on the physical union, the divinely-sanctioned oneness of the newlywed couple.  It shows us how physical intimacy works with God’s blessing.  Literally, it is a blessing of inebriation.  While it is a sin to become drunk with wine, it is wise to lose your mind in the moment of marital union.  A true wonder.  What happens next in the book, however, is what interests us today.

When the honeymoon is over—both physically and metaphorically—the man comes home late one night, all damp and drenched with dew, and asks his wife to open the door.  She refuses with the typical, petty excuses of everyday marriage life, “I have taken off my dress, how can I put it on again?  I have washed my feet, how can I dirty them again?” (Song 5:3).  It is as if she said, “Honey, I have a headache, and that headache right now is you.”  He still advances for a bit, but once she relents of her pity party, the man, in typical fashion, is gone!  The couple is no longer clicking, and this progression in the poem from the wedding night seems intentionally linear to me, as if we have here a typical pattern of marriage.

Right now, you and your bride-to-be are in the stage of marriage that veteran counselor Gary Chapman calls euphoria.  Like a Mountain Dew rush, you are running on the rarified fumes of high-octane love.  And this may last for a year or two.  Couples in this stage are very clingy and love to touch each other at any spare moment.  At some point, however, the honeymoon ends, and the Holy Spirit is warning you of a fallout.  No longer clingy, it will even be hard to look the other in the eye.  And it will feel difficult for you, perhaps even hopeless, to know how to repair the ruins.  In this stage of my marriage, my wife strongly resented me as the source of her unhappiness; but she would never tell me, because it would have hurt me.  However, I remember telling myself in those days that I was romancing the stone (a play on words from a movie at the time).  Then, after a decade, I remember feeling the frustration of her irritation with inner blurts in my mind, “Well, just divorce me then!”  Those days were not fun.  Again, what does the word of God say about this post-euphoria fallout?

First, it takes risky initiative to repair the ruins.  While earlier in the book, the woman is unharmed in her dreamy search for her lost man, she now is beat up (cf. Song 3:1-4; 5:7)!  Admittedly, both episodes are dreams, but I see reality portrayed.  It is a challenge to search for an estranged spouse, especially in taking the first step! 

Second, it often takes counsel.  She is helped by the ladies who ask her to describe her man and then offer to her their assistance.  Rather than receiving counsel for divorce, the wife is led to recall what about him she first enjoyed.  In doing so, the original match is struck and the search continues.

Third, once reunited, the couple enjoys even deeper intimacy than before, with both richer details of beauty and fresh plans of being together.  Ironically, studies have shown that marriages with seasoned love often have more satisfying sexual oneness than those in the early years of euphoria.  Marriage love is far more than physical touch and sufficient hormones.  In the words of counselor Larry Crabb, marriage love works best as the sequence of spirit oneness, soul oneness, and then body oneness.  As you and your wife find satisfaction and security in Christ, you will manipulate less and minister more.  You will become true friends and true lovers (cf. Song 5:16).  Such marriages have beautiful body oneness.  But it is gained through the risky reconciliation of post-euphoria fallout.

Here is where the tattoos come in.  At the climax of the book, the wife tells her husband, “Put me like a seal over your heart, like a seal on your arm.  For love is as strong as death, jealousy is as severe as Sheol; its flashes are flashes of fire, the very flame of the LORD” (Song 8:6).  Like “Susie” inked on his shoulder of an old sailor, she too wants to be visible on his arm.  As a seal signifying ownership, she too wants to be proudly displayed as belonging to him.  And I too want you to wear your wife with pride before the watching world.  Be proud of her.  She is yours.  But even more, I want you to wear her on your heart.  It is perhaps significant that she mentions the heart first.  Just as the mouth speaks what fills the heart, so also a man will be outwardly proud of what he inwardly prizes.  Please, please take this message seriously.  Do not just tattoo her on your arm.  Tattoo her on your heart.  Make her the permanent possession of your deepest cherishing.  Obviously, as in the poem itself, we are talking about something much deeper than physical tattoos.  I believe that deep love—love that fights through the fallout—will first impress her deeply into your heart and then express her naturally in your pride.  Do not settle for anything less than such a deep impression and natural expression.

In the effort to fight euphoria, too many preachers and counselors point to the will.  “Love is a decision,” they say.  Or, “Love is obedience.”  And certainly, there is a truth here.  Love will lead to obedience.  “If you love Me,” Jesus said, “you will keep My commandments” (John 14:15; cf. 2 John 6).  Love will lead to patience and kindness and a whole list of virtues, but love itself is something mysteriously deeper.  It treasures and desires and holds onto what we love with natural tenaciousness (cf. Matthew 6:24).  No wonder the wife describes love as stronger than death, an unquenchable fire that can never be bribed or purchased for any price (Song 8:6-7).  Truly priceless!  That is what I want for you.  Do not be satisfied with mere willingness, let alone tolerance.  Strive for love, pursue it; ask for it, and beg it.  When the euphoria evaporates and you are tempted to be either separated or stay irritated, hold onto the hope of a better day.  A renewed, deepened love will tattoo her deeply on your heart and tattoo her proudly on your arm.

One final word.  Ironically, you are already tattooed.  As a believer in Christ, your heart is already tattooed.  It is a promise of the new covenant, which we have in Christ through the gospel, that God Himself will write His law on our hearts (Jeremiah 31:33).  While the Ten Commandments in stone failed to transform a people, the life of Christ in our hearts supplies what the law requires, and the law is summarized in love.  Praise God!  “Love is from God” (1 John 4:7) and you have already received this love.  Love is truly the “flame of the LORD” (Song 8:6) and you are already on fire.  You already possess what you need to love your wife for life.  Therefore, enjoy the euphoria, but know that the marriage tattoos will someday come through the tattoo of love which you already have in Christ.  God bless you much!  Amen.

The Knowledge of Log College

08 Sunday Aug 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Log College, Ministry

≈ Leave a comment

Over eight centuries before Christ, the Lord contended with His people:

“There is no faithfulness or steadfast love, and no knowledge of God in the land; there is swearing, lying, murder, stealing, and committing adultery; they break all bounds, and bloodshed follows bloodshed. Therefore the land mourns, and all who dwell in it languish” (Hosea 4:1-3).

No knowledge of God in the land.  In short, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6).

Later on, the Lord declares, “I desire steadfast love and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings” (Hosea 6:6).  It is the knowledge of God that is the essence of eternal life, and the means to “all things that pertain to life and godliness” (2 Peter 1:3; cf. John 17:3).

At Countryside Bible Church, we believe that the knowledge of God is fundamental to our growth in grace, and to our transformation in experience.  To achieve these ends, we aim in the Lord to train leaders who know Him well, and who can articulate His thoughts and ways to dying sinners in need of grace.  Unlike the days of Hosea, when it was said to their detriment “like people, like priest,” we aim to see this pattern work for our benefit, with both leaders and congregation knowing God well.

In order to do this, we have launched an in-house ministerial training program called the Log College.  The name comes from colonial America, when middle-aged minister William Tennent, Sr. trained over twenty men for the ministry in a 400-square-foot log cabin, which his enemies put down as The College.  Many of those men became leaders in the Great Awakening, and laid the gospel foundation for the Presbyterian church in America.  Like Tennent, we too aim to provide the church with solid ministers—men who know God experientially, and preach Him fervently.

At Countryside, we believe it is the responsibility of current ministers to train the next generation of ministers.  In his final letter, the apostle Paul charged Timothy, “What you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also” (2 Timothy 2:2).  There are four generations here—Paul, Timothy, the faithful men, and the others to be taught.  In looking down road, who knows how far the ripple effect will be in training men here for the ministry.

The program is simple—one year of study amidst ministry followed by one year of ministry internship.  The study involves reading, discussion, prayer, and Bible exposition.  The internship involves observing, helping, doing, and leading ministry under the theological guidance of an experienced mentor.  Currently, we have eight men scheduled to pursue God together this year in the study group.

Please pray for these men, and for their future ministry.  We live in exciting days, but also in days when the knowledge of God is lacking, and the people of God are suffering because of it.  May the Lord grant us to be faithful with the opportunities ahead of us!

Three Factors in Church Hopping

28 Wednesday Jul 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Counseling, Ministry

≈ Leave a comment

Recently I conversed with a Christian about how to break a pattern of church hopping.  You know the situation.  A couple eagerly joins your church and throws themselves into a variety of ministries and conversations.  Then, after a year or two, they show signs of losing interest and eventually no longer attend.  What are some factors that contribute to this pattern of behavior?  Here are three possibilities.

First, some Christians struggle with issues.  The list is endless.  The style of music, the form of sacraments, the polity of governance, and the strategy of leadership and ministries and sermons are among the weightier matters.  Lesser matters, of course, exist.  We all have them.  According to Paul, the church needs to allow for a diversity of opinion in matters beyond the gospel and the moral law.  A healthy church allows for liberty of conscience, as long as members behave towards God and others in faith and love (Romans 14).  If members, however, hold too tightly to their “own faith” and demand that others comply, the church will soon be fractured.  And if a member seeks a church that matches his growing list of issues, he will quickly move from one church to home church to no church.  He will soon be homeless and helpless—unless, of course, he unfortunately has the charisma and audacity to start his own church with his own conscience guiding pastoral decisions.

In reality, the list of absolutes is quite concentrated around the gospel (Romans 1-11) and the moral law (Romans 12-13).  This list is in keeping with Jesus’ own criteria of identifying true Christians, and by extension, a true church.  First, we must ask: “Do they hold to the words of Jesus as the truth?”  Jesus said, “If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine; and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free” (John 8:31-32).  Those who leave His teachings do not have God (2 John 9).  Second, we must ask: “Do they maintain the fellowship of believers in love?”  Jesus said, “By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:35).  It is not enough to have the truth, but not love.  The church in Ephesus had departed from its initial love and Jesus threatened to remove them as a church, even though they had rightly tested false apostles and shared in Jesus’ hatred for what the false teachers did (Revelation 2:2-7).  Dead orthodoxy is still dead.  But if truth and love are present, the local church is a viable candidate for our membership, regardless of the particular issues.  We must beware of letting issues drive us from church to church.

Second, some Christians struggle with love.  Due to indwelling sin and imperfect judgment, church members will inevitably hurt each other.  We are like porcupines—as one church sociologist once said—the closer we get to one another, the more we poke each other!  For this reason, the Christian virtues of humility, patience, forbearance, and forgiveness are absolutely necessary, if we are to maintain “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3).  True, there are times when an offence must lead to separation—as when a church member or leader interposes himself between us and God and unrepentantly demands that we listen to him (Luke 17:1-4; Matthew 18:15-17)—but such times are fewer than imagined by those who hop from church to church.  If we are easily offended and cannot forget a comment, it will not be long before we find it hard to continue at a church—especially if was caused or said by the leadership.

Related to this problem is the self-serving church member, who chooses a church based on how it meets his needs or the needs of his family.  Certainly, this can be a factor in decision-making—after all, we really do need each other (1 Corinthians 12:21)—but when it becomes The Factor, then the church becomes a means for our personal ends.  Eventually, we find ourselves using others to meet our needs.  Surely something is wrong here.  “Love…does not seek its own” (1 Corinthians 13:4-5).  At the very least, we must remember that Christ alone meets our needs.  If He is present, all things are possible.

Finally, some Christians struggle with authority.  This struggle could be due to an abusive pastor in the past or to a legalistic church environment.  As stated earlier, Christ intends for the church to afford liberty of conscience.  Leaders are expressly told not to lord their authority over the faith of members (1 Peter 5:3; cf. 2 Corinthians 1:24).  Each Christian should be fully convinced in his own mind and have his own faith before God (Romans 14:5, 22).  And through their teachings, leaders should facilitate this growth in faith and love.  Any leader, however, who longs to be first among the brothers and who isolates their loyalties to himself should be resisted with a firm conscience.  It is not only acceptable, but advisable to leave a church under such unrepentant leadership (3 John).  And it is certainly understandable why the victims of such a church would have difficulty joining another church.

Whatever the cause of the struggle, each Christian should recognize his personal need for church authority.  We are sheep.  And sheep should have shepherds—literally, pastors.  While a church with truth and love is a true church, we thrive best in a true and ordered church, complete with a plurality of elders and deacons (1 Timothy 3:1ff; Titus 1:5ff; e.g., Acts 14:21-23).  While it is tempting to think that God’s word alone will keep our souls safe, as if merely preaching the gospel will keep everyone well, we know from the New Testament and from the analogy of God as our Father that the internal word works well with external discipline (Hebrews 12:5-11).  Truly, “the rod and reproof give wisdom” (Proverbs 29:15).  Therefore, we should welcome such authority into our lives.  Symbolically, this welcoming occurs through church membership, which allows for our leaders to know, in particular, for whom they must give an account (Hebrews 13:17).  To be clear, it is not solely the pastors who disciple and discipline the flock.  The ultimate authority under Christ rests in the church as a whole, especially in cases of excommunication, but the elders of a church have genuine authority.  They should be obeyed with appropriate submission (Hebrews 13:17; 1 Peter 5:5).

Issues, love, and authority—three factors that contribute to church hopping.  As a pastor, it breaks my heart to see members leave our church for little reason.  It hurts.  Yes, I recognize that the Church is bigger than a local church, so that in one sense it is healthy for there to be a fluidity between churches, both in members and in leadership.  After all, in the New Testament, we see Priscilla and Aquila in Rome, then in Corinth, then in Ephesus.  We also see Paul sending Titus and Timothy from church to church.  We are not to understand a church covenant to be a marriage covenant, nor are we to expect our pastor to stay for life, long past his effectiveness, as many pastors did in eighteenth-century England to the detriment of their churches.  The later awakenings in America showed the value of mobility.  That said, there should be a good reason for leaving a church.  In keeping with a church covenant, other members are entitled to hear of our reasons for leaving.  Hopefully they will see the validity of the choice; but even if not, the respect given should help to offset any hurt or offence.  They will simply be sad to see us go.  At the very least, we owe this respect to each other in Christ.  Such loyal-love and being-true-to-each-other finds favor both with God and with men (Proverbs 3:3-4).

The Great Commission

02 Friday Jul 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Ministry, Missions

≈ Leave a comment

All authority.

All nations.

All things.

Always.

The Four Horizons of Theology

02 Friday Jul 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Log College, Ministry, Theology

≈ Leave a comment

Theological training in Log College is based on four horizons, which are four historical contexts:

Old Testament (OT)
New Testament (NT)
Church History
Contemporary Culture

The trained minister should be conversant in all four contexts and be able to translate between them.  Terms in one context do not automatically mean the same thing in another context.  The semantic range may differ, such as the NT’s need to supplement “mind” in order to convey the broad meaning of the Hebrew word “heart.”[1]  Sometimes, the term has no one-to-one equivalent at all, such as the Hebrew word hesed (often translated “lovingkindness”).  In addition, OT concepts and institutions are fulfilled in Christ with a fullness that exceeds one-to-one correspondence.  The church, then, enters new cultures, which again changes the exact look of these terms, concepts, and institutions.  Various church traditions begin to use their own theological forms and language, which may not correlate with the Bible’s terminology—or with our own today—and yet their concepts may still be faithful to the inspired Text.  Finally, our own culture has its forms and terminology, which faithful preaching must learn to use, if the gospel is to make sense in our generation.  One theologian called this final translation “theological vision.”[2]  All in all, the four horizons present us with a theological task worthy of the sword of the Spirit and prayer (Eph. 6:17-18)!

To assist the minister in this large task of theological translation, Log College uses three theologies, each of which corresponds to a specific track in the three-year process to potential ordination:

        Biblical Theology – tracing themes of promise and fulfillment in Christ across the Bible’s overall metanarrative

        Historical Theology – tracing the development of doctrine across the church’s overall history

        Systematic Theology – working towards ordination with the categories of theology in a contemporary context

The Bible Track in biblical theology is based on the eight hermeneutical principles that Word Partners uses in their worldwide training: staying on the line, text over framework, genre, asking good questions, traveling instructions (“to them” but “for us”), structure, melody (the main idea and intended response), and biblical theology.[3]

The Theology Track in historical theology is based on the truth that Jesus gave us apostles and prophets, whose inspired writings provide the foundation of the church (Eph. 2:20; 3:5), as well as evangelists, pastors, and teachers, who explain that apostolic word to us (Eph. 4:11).  Both groups are gifts.  As a result, we cannot say that we have no need of teachers (cf. 1 Cor. 12:21).  We have been blessed with both a Bible and twenty centuries of teachers.  Therefore, it is our desire at Log College to let a valued teacher have a seat with us at the table for at least one week of discussion.  This discussion will be more challenging than the Bible track, because we cannot simply take a teacher’s word at face value.  Like the Bereans, we must test each teacher against the inerrant word (Acts 17:11).  In a sense, there is only one Teacher in the room—Jesus Christ—and all these others are simply smart kids who often take better notes and catch more details, and we can look over their shoulders.  No matter what tradition they come from, they all belong to us, and we belong to Christ (1 Cor. 3:21-23).  This mutuality is part of the beauty of the Evangelical Tradition, which traces its emphasis on speaking the word in the Spirit back to the book of Acts itself.

The Ordination Track in systematic theology is based on a historic creed (often the Second London Baptist Confession of 1689) supplemented with contemporary issues.  The minister in training writes his own statement under each heading and then critically discusses this document with an experienced minister.  The final step is not a diploma, but an ordination council—an oral exam before ordained peers in gospel ministry.  Because the right hand of fellowship must not be given hastily (1 Tim. 5:22), time is allowed for follow-up and possible re-examination.

Because we believe that we grow into a fuller understanding of the love of Christ as we “comprehend with all the saints” (Eph. 3:18), each of our three tracks seeks the Holy Spirit’s leading through prayerful discussion.


[1] Peter J. Gentry and Stephen J. Wellum, Kingdom through Covenant: A Biblical-Theological Understanding of the Covenants (Wheaton: Crossway, 2012), 366-69.

[2] For Richard Lint’s concept of “theological vision,” see the introduction to Timothy Keller, Center Church: Doing Balanced, Gospel-Centered Ministry in Your City (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2012), 13-25.

[3] Dig and Discover Hermeneutical Principles: The Core Principles, 3rd, ed. (Palos Heights, IL: WordPartners, 2018).  This booklet can be ordered at https://marketplace.mimeo.com/lrisamples#name=17.

An Open Letter on Music

02 Friday Jul 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Culture, Ministry

≈ Leave a comment

It was certainly not my desire to delay this long in answering your letter about music.  Please forgive me.  In setting it aside for an easily opportune time, such a time never appeared—but is that not common to all busy individuals?  It simply shows that I did not make your concerns a priority, and for that I apologize.  Perhaps the Lord will show us a gracious and good surprise in this negligent delay.  May it be so!

Regarding your categories, I would like to reduce them to two: Text and Tune.  It is my understanding that there should be “a happy marriage between text and tune,” as one British hymn-writer once said.  In general, what is right conforms to what is true, and what is true corresponds to reality; therefore, the right tune will be one that conforms to the message (and not the other way around), and the true text will be one that corresponds to reality.

In application, this means that the words must be true.  For church music that is offered to God (holy music), the Bible tells us explicitly, “Let the word of Christ richly dwell among you, with all wisdom teaching and admonishing one another with psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with thankfulness in your hearts to God” (Colossians 3:16).  The content must not only be biblical, it must be gospel, that is, centered on Christ (“the word about Christ,” cf. Romans 10:17).  Moreover, the content should be rich in the message of the gospel.  Honestly, I think we strive for that at Countryside Bible Church.  Finally, this text tells us that worship music would fall under the teaching ministry of the church.  Like an echo, the songs sung in public worship often remain with us throughout the week to speak to us when we need it.  Like the water that surrounds sand, songs fill up our inner lives behind and around our thoughts; therefore, it is necessary to make them rich in the word about Christ.

Before moving to the tune, let me add that lyrical content is poetic.  It is more than words.  It has form as well, and form matters.  Of the three typical meters for hymnody, the common meter (8.6.8.6) of “Amazing Grace” is iambic (typical of English poetry) and carries enough measures to sustain a thought without compromising it.  Short meter (6.6.8.6) is more difficult and, as a result, is not found much in hymnals.  Long meter (8.8.8.8) works well with more meditative themes, as does another fairly common meter (11.11.11.11) found in (e.g.) “Immortal, Invisible, God Only Wise.”  As with tunes, the meter of the poem has to fit and serve the message of the content.  The Hebrew prophets make their poetry do this, as the quick lines in Nahum 3 show, and so should we!  If the psalm wants to stress order (as in Psalm 2), then make the form orderly.  If the psalm wants to stress disorder, then break the cadence, as in Psalm 82:5.  Do you see?  We do not even know the music of the Hebrews, but we see how they crafted their poetry, and poetry has intrinsic rhythm.  And by the way, the rhythm of a poem is largely determined by the natural rhythm of a language.  When Martin Luther wanted the church service to be spoken in German rather than the Catholic Latin, he realized that new music would need to be written—not just new words.  German, I believe, is more like English, but Latin is typically dactylic, with a HARD-soft-soft cadence instead of the iambic soft-HARD.  Very different!

When it comes to poetic form, our text in Colossians encourages a variety.  That is good, because we have a wide range of themes that we would like to communicate.  The text also encourages the singing of Psalms.  Ironically, some of the Reformed churches most into the regulative principle (only offer to God what He has prescribed) still abide by the original Puritan and Presbyterian principle of singing only metricized Psalms, when the Bible explicitly commands us to also sing hymns and spiritual songs.  (I suppose they assert that these are simply other forms from the biblical Psalter.)  At any rate, I like Isaac Watts approach of not being tied to only singing Psalms, but to sing songs in imitation of David, which to me means striving to have the same breadth and quality of both themes and forms as the Psalms, yet with the same Christ-centeredness, as the Psalms are through and through Messianic.

Now, you will notice that we have not even touched modern music.  There is so much to say with hymns and it is a great place to learn because it typically involves no controversy.  For example, to learn about the happy marriage of text and tune, take the words of the following hymns (all of them are 11.11.11.11) and switch the tunes: “Immortal, Invisible, God Only Wise,” “My Jesus, I Love Thee,” “Away in a Manger,” and “How Firm a Foundation.”

Do you see how some of them feel ludicrous, such as singing “How Firm a Foundation” to a lullaby (either tune of “Away in a Manger”), and yet some of them feel better (e.g. “My Jesus, I Love Thee” is much more confident with the tune of “Immortal, Invisible, God Only Wise”)?  You can easily do this with Common Meter hymns, because there are so many of them.  In doing so, you will gain a feel of how the tune must serve the text for it to be right.  After all, for most of our hymns, the poem was written without a tune, and then only later did the church grab a tune for it (e.g. we sing Newton’s poem “Faith’s Review and Expectation” to an American hymn and call it by its first words “Amazing Grace”).

At this point, we are ready to discuss the musical question of tune. 

First, it is my contention that there are no instruments that are inherently bad and off-limits, especially the percussion section.  The Psalms exhibit a tendency to use a variety of instruments, including loud, clashing cymbals (Psalm 150).  Now, how that instrument is played may determine whether it is right for this lyrical poem or not, but I am opposed to the de facto rejection of instruments, even pipe organs, despite their lavish and questionable expense.  (That was a big debate in Baptist circles two hundred years ago.)

Second, music itself is a language of spirit.  We know this from both David’s harp (1 Samuel 16) and the request of Elisha (2 Kings 3).  Just as some spiritual frames are dangerous to dwell in and give the devil an opportunity, such as perpetual anger (Ephesians 4:26-27) and perpetual sorrow (2 Corinthians 2:7, 11), it would not be wise to have angry or said music lodged in the back of one’s mind playing endlessly and effortlessly.  And one does not need to grab hard rock music for anger, when Beethoven may suffice at times in its overdramatic way.  Now, just as Jesus was angry in the temple and just as we are told to be angry and not sin, there may be use for angry music with a judgment theme, such as the background music in a movie, but I doubt that we would want to craft a hymn with angry music that repeats over and over again.  Does that make sense?

The Bible commands me not only to be renewed in my thoughts but in the spirit of my mind (Ephesians 4:23)—to have the right spirit with the true thoughts.  Therefore, I should select my music with that purpose in mind.  It is no accident that being filled with the Spirit leads to singing with gratitude (Ephesians 5:18-19, which is the parallel text to Colossians 3:16).  And given the psalmist’s desire to bless the Lord at all times (Psalm 34:1), it is hard for me to imagine that ideal being fulfilled by singing about what is false or by singing about what is true with a wrong spirit (i.e. the tune does not fit, serve, or conform to the text).  This ideal does not mean that we must only sing about God directly.  As we discussed, the book of Leviticus shows us three categories—holy, common/clean, and unclean.  Anything clean can be offered to God, even a meal (cf. 1 Timothy 4:1-5); therefore, it should not be rejected, but done with an eye to God’s glory in gratitude.  I can sing “Happy Birthday” to my children and a love song to my wife (after all, the Bible has one!) and do it to the glory of God, being filled with gratitude for His gift of family.

Music is a powerful force and a great indicator of the spirit of a man.  As Shakespeare once said:

        The man that hath no music in himself,

        Nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds,

        Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils;

        The motions of his spirits are dull as night,

        And his affections dark as Erebus.

        Let no such man be trusted.  Mark the music.

There are a lot of red herrings in this debate, such as instruments, but there is also a lot of profound reality in how a man’s music reflects and encourages our spirit.  Like too much caffeine and junk food, I have indulged in music at times to pick me up and give me a jolt, rather than simply as an expression or encouragement of an inner worship of God.  Perhaps the choice is poor or even sinful, at the least in having a missed opportunity, but I wonder if the category of foolish would apply better than wicked to some songs that have good words and a peppy beat, but are musically flat and textually plain.  If that is all that I sing, then I am sinfully missing the richness that God wants for His saved community (Colossians 3:16).  Certainly, a church service should avoid such a musical climate.  And personally, I should strive for a better diet.  May the Lord be gracious and merciful to lead us all in His good and right ways!

Your brother in Christ,

Bob Snyder

Additional Note on Syncopation

The question of syncopation should be looked at historically.  From what I have been told, both Martin Luther’s hymn “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God” and the tune for the Doxology (the Old Hundredth from Geneva, Switzerland) were originally syncopated, although not in a modern way.  The Doxology’s music comes from a collection of French tunes that Queen Elizabeth disliked as “Genevan Jigs.”  In the later Baroque era (and possibly, then, the early Classical era), hymns like these were smoothed out and rationalized into orderly marches of rhythms.  J. S. Bach himself did this for a lot of German hymns.  Therefore, it would not surprise me if we are dealing with a false dichotomy from the Enlightenment, much like the rationalistic-versus-Romantic polarity.  As with Baconian science, the older fundamentalism may be enamored with the rationalistic form of music.

Should a Church Have a School?

02 Friday Jul 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Education, Ministry

≈ Leave a comment

As you may know, Spring Branch Academy is a Christian high school sponsored by our church.  It has an ambitious curriculum and aims to prepare students for their life vocations by instilling wisdom and inspiring worship.  That is our heart!  These things you may know, but do you know why a church would have a school?

Personally, I’m hesitant to promote Christian education with negative reasons—not because these reasons aren’t true, but because they’re not enough.  Yes, the public schools have a God-less curriculum (literally!), and yes, the youth culture and its social media can be toxic, but surely we can aim for goals higher than merely protecting our kids.  After all, what is the point of protection, if we have no higher purpose to protect them for?

Ultimately, we want them to live free lives in Christ and for Christ.  To do so, we aim primarily at their personal liberation through “the sacred writings, which are able to make [them] wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 3:15).  We love the Bible and use the Bible in class.  We teach twelve courses in Theology to show students why and how they can trust this Book and its Author in everything, including language, society, marriage, finances, parenting, history, and salvation.  We also seek to love each student and their family.  At its heart, our Christian school is an extension of our pastoral ministry to families.

Granted, but math?  Greek?  What do such things have to do with our spiritual lives?

To live free lives, we need empowerment.  Anyone of us are “free” to dunk a basketball, but few are us are empoweredto do it.  We want our students empowered to do all that Christ has called them to do in this world for His glory, and to do that, our school makes use of the liberal arts—literally, the skills (arts) necessary for free men.

Just think of our Bible.  What is necessary to understand it?  Well, in the Reformation, William Tyndale knew it needed to be translated from Greek into English in order for every plowboy in England to read it for himself.  Empowerment!  But is that it?  Martin Luther knew that the biblical languages were the sheath for housing the sword of the Spirit, and therefore, he encouraged the German princes to sponsor schools.  Extending his metaphor, we might say that knowing English well is necessary for understanding an English Bible.  One half of the liberal arts empowers students in the skills of language through training in grammar, logical argument, and rhetorical forms of speech, especially poetry.

The other half of the liberal arts empowers students to listen to God’s other “book,” the world of nature, a world formed by the same divine word and obedient to His laws (Psalm 119:89-91).  To speak this language, students must speak math, the language of science.  If it is God who teaches the farmer how to farm as part of His wondrous counsel (Isaiah 28:23-29), then true science learned and applied from the book of nature is also part of His glory.  We want students to be empowered in both books as free individuals in Christ.  All truth is God’s truth!

Do you see?  What an opportunity would be missed if we only focused on what a Christian school keeps students from, without thanking God for what a Christian school prepares students for.  God be praised!  Thank you for sponsoring a school and making it available for our families, as well as our country and this community.

Christians, Persecution, and Their Codex

02 Friday Jul 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Culture, Ministry

≈ Leave a comment

“A prudent man sees evil and hides himself, the naïve proceed and pay the penalty” (Proverbs 27:12).

In discerning the times, as in discerning the weather (a comparison our Lord Himself made), percentages are used by necessity.  Not being prophets, we make educated guesses.  The future is known only the Lord, who has left us with typical patterns and the identification of factors that often lead to a particular outcome.  Therefore, at best, a prudent man “sees evil” coming with near-sighted eyes.  Precision is an illusion.

That said, let us link the past with the future on the matter of the codex.  A codex is the typical, physical form of a book: a collection of loose pages bound on one side, whether stitched or glued.  In biblical language, the word book refers only to a literary work, a collection of words, and not to its particular form of delivery.  The form may vary.  In ancient times, a book was typically found on a scroll.  Today, we often read books on a digital device.  Either way, the book is independent of the vehicle.

For Christians, the book is not open to debate.  We have one Book, the Bible, which is simply Greek for “book”!  Our book, as inspired literature, is the holy book, the Holy Bible, the only book spoken by God Himself.

The form of this Book, however, is open to debate.  From earliest times, Christians have sensed the freedom to experiment in the form of their Book.  Apparently, Christians were culturally instrumental in shifting the ancient world from the scroll to the codex.  According to textual scholar Bruce Metzger, Christians found the codex helpful in proof-texting, in binding collections such as the gospels and Paul’s letters, and in the economy of two-sided writings.  Interestingly, while scrolls also could be written on both sides (Revelation 5:1) and bind collections such as the Jewish minor prophets (“The Twelve”), quick referencing would definitely be difficult.  In contrast, a codex facilitates proof-texting and cross-referencing, a practice almost demanded of Christians by the gospel itself, as the fulfillment of divine prophecy.  For this reason alone, the codex has found a special place in the hearts of Christians.

Given this freedom in form, it would be wise for Christians today to think strategically about the form of their Book, and not just practically.  While digital Bibles have a practical advantage, the codex is strategically superior.

On a practical level, the digital revolution has brought digital Bibles, and while nostalgic preachers may miss the rustle of pages during a pause in the sermon, the advantages for quick referencing surpass even the best reference Bible.  True, we may miss the mental map of our favorite places on the page, and we may find the iPhone a lazy crutch against memorizing Scripture, but thoughtful Christians can overcome these disadvantages and should not be chided for bringing only their smartphone to church.  Portability and easy access to divine truth fits well with a gospel movement.  The very shift itself in form testifies to the practical advantage that many have found in a digital book.

Strategically, however, prudence would argue strongly for the codex.  Just as portable as an iPhone—one Bible published by the American Bible Society in 1869 measures 5 x 3 x 1.5 inches in size—the codex needs no electricity.  It sits completely off the grid.  Moreover, the codex needs no device to run it.  It will never be excluded by technology, whose developments have left cassettes and VHS tapes with little hardware for their use.  Just think, given the ease of Internet downloads, the DC and DVD will soon lack devices to play them, just as the laptop recording this article has no port for a disc.  Strategically, the unplugged Bible has a lot going for it!

Given the political and cultural environment, the codex beats the digital form hands down.  We live in a world dominated by a Kantian fact-value split.  Because truth can no longer determine what is right or wrong, values have been left to personal choice and self-identity.  This hallmark of postmodern life has now been ensconced in anti-discrimination law and backed by the Supreme Court’s individualized definition of freedom to such an extent that one recent commentator, Christopher Caldwell, labeled it a “second constitution” (Imprimus, February 2020).  Even in symbols, we find the traditional American flag increasingly replaced by a rainbow flag, whose wrongly-sequenced colors pervert a biblical symbol as much as the swastika twisted the cross.  When we view this second constitution and its Supreme Court against the backdrop of the Progressive-era administrative state with its kingly powers of khadi-type justice, we are only lacking a charismatic executive as president to instill full-scale repression of Christianity as the sole opponent of Sodom.  Should we not, as Christians, take notice of this cultural and political development and prepare ourselves?

For example, how will we educate our children and our ministers in the future?  If we convert all our means to a digital format, we have seen that the Internet powers, both Google and Amazon, strongly back the sexual revolution.  If we rely on them, we may find our digital sources censored or removed.  And even if we place our materials on USB thumb-drives, we are not the makers of the devices that place these memory sticks.  The devices themselves could be tied to the grid in such a way that certain information is prohibited.  No method, of course, is fool-proof, but the codex must be physically hunted down in order to be destroyed.  Scattered ants may be small, but they are hard to exterminate when they spread out.

Centralization leads to totalitarianism.  Right now, all the eggs are increasingly in one basket—the Internet—but the basket is increasingly in the hands of a centralized few who hate the Christ of Christianity.  Why would Christians willingly keep their eggs there?  Prudence is calling Christians to prepare alternative means of evangelism and education that do not rely on the Internet, electronics, or electricity.  Yes, we should continue to use these digitals means as long as we can for the sake of the digital audience and convenience, but we should not rely on them for our long-range planning.  Prudence for the future is calling us is to reconsider the codex of our past.

Expository Preaching Is Not Enough

02 Friday Jul 2021

Posted by Bob Snyder in Ministry, Preaching

≈ Leave a comment

“The Word of God is preached too often in a way that will not transform listeners because it fails to discriminate and fails to apply.”

—Joel Beeke, “The Lasting Power of Reformed Experiential Preaching”

This past summer, I participated in a conference on expository preaching, where principles of exposition were followed by models of expository preaching.  The aim was to expose the meaning of the text for the sake of our listeners.  In other words, to borrow lingo from Leadership Resources International, the main idea and intended response of the biblical passage must become the main idea and intended response of the sermon.  The strength of this method lies in its authority.  The listener can see for himself that the Bible actually makes the statement, not just the preacher.  Instead of a “truth balloon” suspended above the text—something true, but not in that text—the truth extends from the text.  The meaning is exposed.

Now, depending on the preacher, the particular text, and, of course, the heart of the listener, transformation may or may not result from an expository sermon.  Transformation occurs when the Holy Spirit Himself applies the meaning of a particular text to a particular person in a particular way.  The listener somehow senses that this text is for me and for this purpose.  In contrast, a general message, even when its meaning is faithfully derived and delivered, often fails to impress the listener with its particular importance.  At times, it might succeed—even as John Piper learned once in preaching Isaiah 6 without an application—but that is the exception, not the norm.  Most listeners need discrimination (specifying to whom the text speaks) and application (for what purpose).

The Sermon on the Mount definitely exhibits all three traits—exposition, discrimination, and application.  As exposition, the sermon explains the real meaning of the law and drives the commandment back to the heart.  As discrimination, the sermon tests for hypocrisy and ends with lots of twos—two gates, two roads, two destinations, and two builders.  As application, the sermon exhorts disciples to trust rather than to worry, and to pray rather than to judge.  What a sermon!  Even the book of Matthew presents it as a model of how Jesus preached when He went from village to village (Matthew 4:23).  And because the Spirit of Jesus Himself lives in us, it is not unreasonable to expect Spirit-filled preaching to resemble the preaching of Jesus Himself.

At least two apostolic texts remind us of the importance of this kind of preaching.  First, in his second letter, Peter tells his readers twice that he aims “to stir [them] up by way of reminder” (2 Peter 1:13; cf. 3:1).  Much of pulpit ministry is reminder—rarely, do we preachers tell forty-year veterans something new—but it is reminder with a purpose.  Somehow, we must stir them up, and this will require diligence (1:15, “I will make every effort”).  Second, in his open letter to a younger preacher, Paul tells us the goal of the pulpit: “The aim of our charge is love” (1 Timothy 1:5).  Love, however, does not arise automatically from hearing the text; on the contrary, love “issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith” (1:5; cf. 2 Peter 1:5-7).  All of this involves discrimination and application.  In other words, the text must be closely applied to matters of purity, guilt, and sincerity.

Knowing how the text applies involves more than exegetical skill and doctrinal formulation.  Somehow, the preacher himself must live out the text, wrestling with its implications and submitting to its promises in a real-life context.  By necessity, the preacher is part of the equation of success: “Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching.  Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers” (1 Timothy 4:16).  Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the preacher himself continually needs wisdom from the sacred text for ultimate salvation through faith in Christ Jesus (2 Timothy 3:15).  The pulpit ministry needs wisdom and wisdom involves experience in applying the text personally.

Therefore, if these premises are true, we need more than expository preaching.  We also need insight into living that comes from applying to our experiences the broad scope of Scripture—not just one paragraph at a time, in piecemeal fashion.  Yes, we can preach from a particular passage—perhaps, we even should preach from a particular passage—but the application will draw from the broad wisdom of Scripture learned through the rich experience of endured trials of faith and discerning love.  The Puritans called such preaching experimental, because it involves “examining experience in the light of the teaching of the Word of God” (Beeke).  In modern times, we would more likely call it experiential.  Perhaps we could combine all the words into one statement:

We need preaching that is expository, experimental, and experiential—all three.

As expository preaching, the sermon will expose the main idea and intended response of the original text.  As experimental preaching, the sermon will test listeners and their behavior, leading to proper identification and classification.  As experiential preaching, the sermon will apply the text to the heart and life of the listeners in such a way that making a choice is unmistakable and believers are stirred up unto love and good deeds.  In an Old Testament framework, these three traits of good preaching correspond well to knowledge, discernment, and wisdom.  In a New Testament framework, these three traits correspond well to faith, hope, and love.  The first set has the preacher in mind; the second, his listeners.  Expository, experimental, and experiential preaching.  That is what we need in our pulpits today.

Source: Beeke, Joel. Puritan Reformed Spirituality. Webster, NY: Evangelical Press USA, 2006 [2004], 428, 427.

← Older posts

Blogroll

  • Countryside Bible Church
  • Spring Branch Academy

Categories

  • Canon
  • Christ
  • Christian Living
  • Counseling
  • Culture
  • Deuteronomy
  • East and West
  • Education
  • Eschatology
  • Ethics
  • God
  • History
  • Job
  • John
  • Log College
  • Man
  • Medieval History
  • Ministry
  • Missions
  • Modern History
  • Preaching
  • Psalms
  • Salvation
  • Scripture
  • Theology
  • Worship

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Log College Ministry
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Log College Ministry
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar